SafetyDecember 20, 202420 min read

IEC 61508 Safety Standards: Complete Implementation Guide

Master functional safety in PLC programming. Complete guide to SIL requirements, safety interlocks, compliance verification, and implementing safety-rated systems across Siemens, Rockwell, Schneider, and other major platforms.

shieldIEC 61508 Overview

IEC 61508, titled “Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-related Systems,” is the foundational international standard for functional safety. Published in seven parts, it provides a framework for ensuring safety-critical systems operate reliably to prevent harm to people, property, and the environment.

For PLC programmers, IEC 61508 defines stringent requirements for safety system design, implementation, validation, and ongoing maintenance. Compliance is mandatory for industries including oil and gas, chemical processing, pharmaceuticals, nuclear power, and any application where system failure could cause serious injury or death.

The Seven Parts of IEC 61508

  • Part 1: General requirements for safety lifecycle
  • Part 2: Requirements for E/E/PE safety-related systems
  • Part 3: Software requirements (most relevant for PLC programming)
  • Part 4: Definitions and abbreviations
  • Part 5: Examples of methods for determination of SIL
  • Part 6: Guidelines on application of Parts 2 and 3
  • Part 7: Overview of techniques and measures

assessmentUnderstanding SIL Levels

Safety Integrity Level (SIL) is a measure of risk reduction provided by a safety function. Higher SIL levels require more stringent design, validation, and testing to achieve lower probability of dangerous failure.

SIL LevelProbability of Failure per HourRisk Reduction FactorTypical Applications
SIL 110⁻¹ to 10⁻²10 to 100Minor injury risk, equipment protection
SIL 210⁻² to 10⁻³100 to 1,000Serious injury risk, standard machinery
SIL 310⁻³ to 10⁻⁴1,000 to 10,000Fatal injury risk, critical processes
SIL 410⁻⁴ to 10⁻⁵10,000 to 100,000Catastrophic risk, nuclear, aviation

infoISO 13849 Performance Level Equivalents

For machinery applications, ISO 13849-1 uses Performance Levels (PL) instead of SIL:

  • PL e: Roughly equivalent to SIL 3
  • PL d: Roughly equivalent to SIL 2
  • PL c: Roughly equivalent to SIL 1
  • PL a/b: Lower than SIL 1

analyticsRisk Assessment and SIL Determination

Before implementing safety functions, you must conduct a thorough risk assessment to determine the required SIL level for each safety function.

Risk Assessment Process

  1. Step 1: Hazard Identification
    Identify all potential hazards in normal operation, maintenance, and fault conditions.
  2. Step 2: Risk Analysis
    Evaluate severity of harm and probability of occurrence for each hazard.
  3. Step 3: Risk Evaluation
    Determine if risk is tolerable or requires reduction through safety functions.
  4. Step 4: SIL Assignment
    Assign appropriate SIL level based on required risk reduction.
  5. Step 5: Safety Requirements Specification
    Document detailed requirements for each safety function.

verified_userSafety-Rated PLC Platforms

Safety applications require certified safety PLCs with hardware and software validated to IEC 61508. Here are the major safety PLC platforms:

Siemens Safety PLCs

  • S7-1500F/FH: SIL 3 / PLe certified
  • S7-1200F: SIL 2 / PLd certified
  • Software: TIA Portal Safety (F-programming)
  • Features: Integrated standard + safety logic
  • Safety I/O: PROFIsafe communication

Rockwell Safety PLCs

  • GuardLogix: SIL 3 / PLe certified
  • Compact GuardLogix: SIL 3 / PLe certified
  • Software: Studio 5000 with Safety
  • Features: Integrated motion + safety
  • Safety I/O: CIP Safety over EtherNet/IP

Schneider Safety PLCs

  • M580 Safety: SIL 3 / PLe certified
  • M262 Safety: SIL 2 / PLd certified
  • Software: Control Expert Safety or Machine Expert Safety
  • Features: Hot-standby safety systems
  • Safety I/O: PROFIsafe or Modbus Safety

Other Safety Platforms

  • Omron NX-SL: SIL 3 / PLe certified
  • ABB AC500-S: SIL 3 / PLe certified
  • Pilz PSS4000: SIL 3 / PLe certified
  • SICK: Dedicated safety controllers

codeSafety PLC Programming

Safety programming follows strict rules and uses certified function blocks to ensure reliable operation.

Example: Emergency Stop Safety Function (Siemens S7-1500F)

// Safety Program - Emergency Stop
// SIL 3 / PLe certified function

FUNCTION_BLOCK FB_EmergencyStop
VAR_INPUT
    EStop_Ch1 : BOOL;  // E-Stop input channel 1
    EStop_Ch2 : BOOL;  // E-Stop input channel 2 (redundant)
    Reset : BOOL;      // Manual reset button
END_VAR
VAR_OUTPUT
    SafeOutput : BOOL; // Safe motor enable
    Error : BOOL;      // Discrepancy error
END_VAR
VAR
    F_FDBACK : F_FDBACK;  // Certified feedback monitoring
END_VAR

// Emergency stop with redundant channels
IF (EStop_Ch1 AND EStop_Ch2) THEN
    SafeOutput := TRUE;  // Both channels OK
ELSE
    SafeOutput := FALSE; // At least one E-Stop active
END_IF;

// Channel discrepancy monitoring
IF (EStop_Ch1 XOR EStop_Ch2) THEN
    Error := TRUE;  // Channels disagree - fault condition
    SafeOutput := FALSE;
END_IF;

// Reset only allowed when both channels released
IF Reset AND EStop_Ch1 AND EStop_Ch2 THEN
    Error := FALSE;
END_IF;

END_FUNCTION_BLOCK

Safety Programming Rules

  • Use ONLY certified safety function blocks from manufacturer library
  • Implement redundancy for SIL 2 and above (dual-channel inputs)
  • Include cross-monitoring to detect faults between channels
  • Safety logic must be fail-safe (outputs de-energize on failure)
  • Require manual reset after safety function activation
  • No conditional resets that could bypass safety
  • Safety and standard logic execute in separate CPU partitions

check_circleValidation and Testing

IEC 61508 requires rigorous testing to verify safety functions operate correctly under all conditions, including fault scenarios.

Required Testing Activities

  • Unit Testing: Test individual safety function blocks
  • Integration Testing: Verify interaction between safety functions
  • System Testing: Complete system validation with all I/O
  • Fault Injection: Test response to sensor failures, communication errors
  • Stress Testing: Verify performance under extreme conditions
  • Proof Testing: Periodic testing to detect dangerous failures

descriptionSafety Documentation Requirements

Comprehensive documentation is mandatory for IEC 61508 compliance and certification.

DocumentPurposeRequired For
Safety Requirements SpecificationDetailed safety function requirementsAll SIL levels
Safety PlanOverall safety lifecycle managementAll SIL levels
FMEDA ReportFailure modes and diagnostic analysisSIL 2-4
Validation ReportTest results and verificationAll SIL levels
Safety ManualOperation and maintenance proceduresAll SIL levels

functionsCommon Safety Functions

IEC 61508 defines standard safety functions commonly implemented across industries. Here are the most critical ones:

Emergency Stop (E-Stop)

Immediately halts all machine motion when activated. Requires dual-channel monitoring for SIL 2+ and manual reset.

  • SIL Rating: Typically SIL 3 / PLe
  • Inputs: Redundant emergency stop buttons (2 channels)
  • Outputs: Motor contactors, drive enables
  • Response Time: < 50ms

Safety Light Curtain

Optical sensors detect personnel entering hazardous zones and trigger safe machine stop.

  • SIL Rating: SIL 2-3 / PLd-PLe
  • Inputs: Safety light curtain OSSDs (Output Signal Switching Devices)
  • Functions: Muting, blanking, cascading
  • Response Time: Calculated from stopping time + light curtain response

Safety Door Interlock

Monitors guard doors and prevents machine operation when doors are open, or stops motion when doors open.

  • SIL Rating: SIL 2-3 / PLd-PLe
  • Inputs: Safety door switches with coded magnets
  • Functions: Guard locking, escape release
  • Variants: Type 2 (monitoring only), Type 4 (locking)

Safe Torque Off (STO)

Removes power from drive motor, preventing unintended motion. Most common safety function in modern drives.

  • SIL Rating: SIL 2-3 / PLd-PLe
  • Application: Integrated in VFDs and servo drives
  • Standards: IEC 61800-5-2 for drive safety
  • Activation: Via safety PLC or hardwired safety relay

Two-Hand Control

Requires simultaneous activation of two buttons to start machine operation, ensuring operator hands are clear of danger zone.

  • SIL Rating: SIL 2-3 / PLd-PLe
  • Inputs: Dual palm buttons with time synchronization
  • Timing: Both inputs within 0.5 seconds
  • Types: Type IIIA, IIIB, IIIC per ISO 13851

Safety Interlock Sequence

Enforces specific operational sequences to prevent hazardous conditions (e.g., pressurized system must depressurize before access).

  • SIL Rating: SIL 1-3 depending on hazard severity
  • Application: Chemical processes, pressure vessels, robotics
  • Logic: State machine with condition monitoring
  • Bypass: Maintenance bypass with key switch (logged)

buildProof Testing and Maintenance

Safety systems degrade over time. IEC 61508 requires periodic proof testing to detect dangerous undetected failures and maintain the required SIL rating.

Proof Test Intervals

SIL LevelTypical IntervalMaximum Interval
SIL 112 months24 months
SIL 26 months12 months
SIL 33 months6 months

Proof Test Procedures

  1. Functional Testing: Activate each safety input and verify correct safety response
  2. Redundancy Testing: Test each channel independently to verify discrepancy detection
  3. Timing Verification: Measure safety function response time against specifications
  4. Diagnostic Coverage: Verify built-in diagnostic functions detect faults
  5. Documentation: Record all test results, failures, and corrective actions
  6. Component Replacement: Replace components showing wear or exceeding service life

warningCritical Maintenance Requirements

  • Never bypass or disable safety functions without proper lock-out/tag-out procedures
  • Maintain detailed logs of all proof tests and maintenance activities
  • Use only certified replacement components with same or higher SIL rating
  • Revalidate safety functions after any program modifications or component changes
  • Ensure maintenance personnel are trained and authorized for safety system work

verifiedAchieving IEC 61508 Compliance

Full IEC 61508 compliance requires a systematic approach throughout the entire safety lifecycle.

Compliance Checklist

check_circle

Hazard and Risk Analysis Complete

All hazards identified, risks evaluated, SIL levels assigned

check_circle

Safety Requirements Specification

Detailed functional requirements for each safety function

check_circle

Certified Safety Hardware

Safety PLCs, I/O modules, and field devices with proper SIL certification

check_circle

Safety-Compliant Programming

Using only certified function blocks, proper redundancy, fail-safe logic

check_circle

Comprehensive Validation

Unit, integration, system, and fault injection testing completed

check_circle

Complete Documentation

Safety plan, FMEDA, validation reports, safety manual

check_circle

Third-Party Certification

Independent assessment by TÜV, UL, or other notified body

check_circle

Ongoing Maintenance Program

Proof testing schedule, component lifecycle tracking

Certification Bodies

Independent third-party certification validates IEC 61508 compliance:

  • TÜV (Germany): Most recognized for industrial safety certification
  • UL (USA): Underwriters Laboratories - North America focus
  • FM Approvals: Factory Mutual - insurance-backed certification
  • Exida: Specialized in functional safety and cybersecurity
  • SGS: Global testing and certification services

Multi-Platform Compliance

All major PLC platforms support IEC 61508 compliance, but implementation varies:

Siemens TIA Portal Safety

Built-in safety program editor, automatic SIL verification, F-program compilation

Rockwell Studio 5000 Safety

Integrated safety task, GuardLogix certified blocks, SIL/PLr calculator

Schneider Machine Expert Safety

Unity Safety or Machine Expert Safety editor, M580 Safety platform

CODESYS Safety

Platform-independent safety runtime, multiple hardware vendors supported

Conclusion

IEC 61508 compliance is essential for safety-critical PLC applications. By following the standard requirements for risk assessment, using certified safety PLCs, implementing proper safety programming practices, and maintaining rigorous documentation, you can achieve the necessary Safety Integrity Levels while protecting people and assets.

Modern AI-powered tools like PLCAutoPilot can assist with safety programming by generating certified function block implementations, ensuring proper redundancy, and automating documentation—but always under the supervision of qualified safety engineers and subject to full validation and certification processes.

securitySafety-Compliant PLC Programming with PLCAutoPilot

PLCAutoPilot generates IEC 61508-compliant safety logic using certified function blocks from all major platforms. Accelerate safety system development while maintaining full compliance.

Learn About Safety Features